Doc750
Apr 23, 09:17 AM
so I gave up last night, and figured I'd try again this morning. I wake up the mac, and preview is not responding and quits unexpectedly. :(
wasted my entire fri afternoon and night.
wasted my entire fri afternoon and night.
McGiord
Apr 23, 01:20 PM
I save a Pages document in Word format and when I open it in Word there are 2 extra pages, the original document has 2 pages full of word lines.
Word is seeing the document with 5 extra lines for each page, therefore the two page document is now 4 pages in Word.
The paper size is the same: letter.
The margins are also the same.
The formatting seems to be the same: font size, paragraphs, bullets and tabs.
The versions I am using are Pages '09 and Word 2011.
My question is if you have any idea on how to make the document the same in Word with only 2 pages.
I need to create this document in Word.
Word is seeing the document with 5 extra lines for each page, therefore the two page document is now 4 pages in Word.
The paper size is the same: letter.
The margins are also the same.
The formatting seems to be the same: font size, paragraphs, bullets and tabs.
The versions I am using are Pages '09 and Word 2011.
My question is if you have any idea on how to make the document the same in Word with only 2 pages.
I need to create this document in Word.
iGary
Sep 13, 06:28 AM
I think he does that in just about every keynote. Still a nice thing to do though :)
He drives them like slaves the rest of the time - he needs to me nice every once and a while. :D
He drives them like slaves the rest of the time - he needs to me nice every once and a while. :D
simsaladimbamba
May 2, 02:21 PM
If it is an Aluminium MBP (early 2008) and not one of the current Unibody MBPs (late 2008), maybe this applies: http://support.apple.com/kb/ts2377
Hellhammer
Apr 2, 07:34 AM
I may be incorrect, but wouldn't a System run off an external run really slow? Unless the external is connected via Firewire, or Thunderbolt >:D
Depends on the overall setup. If you have a small 2.5" 5400rpm drive in your Mac, then USB 2.0 isn't much slower. I guess OP's main idea is to test Lion and USB 2.0 is more than fine for that.
Depends on the overall setup. If you have a small 2.5" 5400rpm drive in your Mac, then USB 2.0 isn't much slower. I guess OP's main idea is to test Lion and USB 2.0 is more than fine for that.
stridemat
Feb 7, 04:35 PM
The hubbub should calm down soon.
kevingaffney
Mar 16, 02:21 PM
Hey Mac-addicts! ive just got Photoshop but don't know how to use it! :eek:
so could anybody give me any good websites to learn how to use it! or can anyone give me some good advice! :confused:
Would help a lot!
Thanks
I'm self taught. Whenever there is something I cant do, I google it. There's tons of tutorials online
so could anybody give me any good websites to learn how to use it! or can anyone give me some good advice! :confused:
Would help a lot!
Thanks
I'm self taught. Whenever there is something I cant do, I google it. There's tons of tutorials online
maru06
Mar 24, 09:40 AM
Well, I'm missing the original disc, so I can't very much try that.
Will definitely get quotes for a new hard drive and turn it over to the powers that be... Thanks for the tips y'all!
Will definitely get quotes for a new hard drive and turn it over to the powers that be... Thanks for the tips y'all!
.dan
Mar 22, 06:55 PM
you had a look at the Belkin SOHO range?
http://catalog.belkin.com/IWCatSectionView.process?IWAction=Load&Merchant_Id=&Section_Id=201729
http://catalog.belkin.com/IWCatSectionView.process?IWAction=Load&Merchant_Id=&Section_Id=201729
whooleytoo
Apr 15, 10:36 AM
Bad in that the stuff that is encouraging people to move over is the angry bird type games and that it appears to make the more in depth stuff isn't as profitable. So in the long run we may not see as many games come out that are profitable.
Well, when you have people complaining about the price of 2 euro games, then you know the market is just a rush to the bottom. Simple games that can be quickly and cheaply made; with very little depth. I prefer longer, more involved gameplay too, but who's going to make those games with the price point so low?
Already it is sad when you look at the console market a lot of games are just games based on popular movies and not much innovation (cause the games based on the movies make the money and stuff like Okami and more innovative stuff gets ignored). I remember when I was reading an article complaining about how that was the trend in games (it happened to movies too once blockbusters came out. Movie studios were more interested in making blockbusters than unique movies, basically finding a formula that worked and sticking with it rather than trying anything different).
I agree, it's the same thing. If you want to make a big game (or movie), you need lots of money. That means you need an investor - whose motivation is making a profit. To make a profit you then have to sell a lot of copies, so the game has to be mainstream. It has to be low-risk, so will stick to conventional, proven game-types. Great for investors, boring and predictable for gamers.
Well, when you have people complaining about the price of 2 euro games, then you know the market is just a rush to the bottom. Simple games that can be quickly and cheaply made; with very little depth. I prefer longer, more involved gameplay too, but who's going to make those games with the price point so low?
Already it is sad when you look at the console market a lot of games are just games based on popular movies and not much innovation (cause the games based on the movies make the money and stuff like Okami and more innovative stuff gets ignored). I remember when I was reading an article complaining about how that was the trend in games (it happened to movies too once blockbusters came out. Movie studios were more interested in making blockbusters than unique movies, basically finding a formula that worked and sticking with it rather than trying anything different).
I agree, it's the same thing. If you want to make a big game (or movie), you need lots of money. That means you need an investor - whose motivation is making a profit. To make a profit you then have to sell a lot of copies, so the game has to be mainstream. It has to be low-risk, so will stick to conventional, proven game-types. Great for investors, boring and predictable for gamers.
Chaszmyr
Aug 15, 04:31 PM
I guess that just kind of describes people's love-hate relationship with XP.
It's a work of creative genius! :D
It's a work of creative genius! :D
ejj
Mar 26, 07:19 PM
I think a few other people have mentioned that too - I experience the same problem, but always on my Mini-DisplayPort monitor, not the Mini-DVI (I have the 2009 Mini).
I take it powering off/on the monitor is sufficient to bring it back to life? That typically works for me.
Duh, I've never tried that. I've always put the computer back to sleep and wake it up again, or change that monitors resolution, and change it back (if I can access that menu). I'll try to power cycle the monitor next time. Thanks!
I take it powering off/on the monitor is sufficient to bring it back to life? That typically works for me.
Duh, I've never tried that. I've always put the computer back to sleep and wake it up again, or change that monitors resolution, and change it back (if I can access that menu). I'll try to power cycle the monitor next time. Thanks!
MarkCollette
Oct 25, 12:55 PM
Does anyone know what GPU you need to get resolution independence?
- Have an address bar so I can copy and paste file locations. Really useful to a developer, especially with working between the Finder and Terminal.
Drag-n-drop file/folder in terminal (you can drag icon in title bar too)
- Have a way of seeing how much disk space directories and their children take up, both with number sizes and graphically.
Info window? You won't have the graphical view, though.
Cool, at least now I'll be able to copy things from the Finder to the Terminal with your approach. Still won't work in reverse though.
The thing is that the size is around a six digit number, something that easily would fit in the existing Finder window, without needing another popup inspector window. Especially on small 1024x768 screens like my 12" iBook.
Web pages are NOT resolution independent for the most part.
Not disagreeing with you at all, but just thinking how sad this is. Anyone remember when HTML first came out, it was a language to describe the logical structure of a document, not really how to lay it out. The idea being that any browser on any platform or device could render it however. And here we are, where websites are made to fit only at 800x600 or 1024x768, and won't take advantage of larger resolution screens.
Yeah I don't think so. Unless you scale it to an exact multiple, it's going to look like crap.
Depends on the anti-aliasing algorithm. If it's done in hardware, then exact multiples shouldn't be an issue.
I'm with you all the way on this.
On the download, right-click yr desktop and click keep arranged by ...whatever you like... to prevent from the downloads stacking up eachother
Thank you, but I put my icons in specific places on my Desktop, so if I organised by name or anything, then it would jumble everything up.
- Have an address bar so I can copy and paste file locations. Really useful to a developer, especially with working between the Finder and Terminal.
Drag-n-drop file/folder in terminal (you can drag icon in title bar too)
- Have a way of seeing how much disk space directories and their children take up, both with number sizes and graphically.
Info window? You won't have the graphical view, though.
Cool, at least now I'll be able to copy things from the Finder to the Terminal with your approach. Still won't work in reverse though.
The thing is that the size is around a six digit number, something that easily would fit in the existing Finder window, without needing another popup inspector window. Especially on small 1024x768 screens like my 12" iBook.
Web pages are NOT resolution independent for the most part.
Not disagreeing with you at all, but just thinking how sad this is. Anyone remember when HTML first came out, it was a language to describe the logical structure of a document, not really how to lay it out. The idea being that any browser on any platform or device could render it however. And here we are, where websites are made to fit only at 800x600 or 1024x768, and won't take advantage of larger resolution screens.
Yeah I don't think so. Unless you scale it to an exact multiple, it's going to look like crap.
Depends on the anti-aliasing algorithm. If it's done in hardware, then exact multiples shouldn't be an issue.
I'm with you all the way on this.
On the download, right-click yr desktop and click keep arranged by ...whatever you like... to prevent from the downloads stacking up eachother
Thank you, but I put my icons in specific places on my Desktop, so if I organised by name or anything, then it would jumble everything up.
sananda
Jan 16, 01:59 PM
Just out of curiosity, what do you want a new Cinema Display for, exactly, that the current ones aren't doing?
i'd like thinner ones. and more connections.
i'd like thinner ones. and more connections.
WardC
Mar 22, 05:10 PM
That clear-case Newton "Cadillac" is pretty damn cool. I have two Clear case Newton 110s, and it would be nice to add to the collection. I cannot afford the $2400 price tag though. I wonder if it's possible to even get the unit working. It looks like this might have a backlit display, don't know if it's color or black and white. Pretty interesting looking piece of equipment.
willieva
Apr 10, 04:56 PM
From your desktop can you ping 192.168.2.2 and from the laptop ping 192.168.2.1?
From the diagram and your description, the laptop doesn't have a wireless connection. So it's a bit puzzling when you say it keeps trying to use the wireless. How are you trying to copy files, using Finder? Try scp'ing using the ip addresses you gave, if the pings work.
BTW, I've got my laptop with a 192.x.x.x address for the wired connection, and a 10.x.x.x address for the wireless. It's having no problems seeing both networks.
From the diagram and your description, the laptop doesn't have a wireless connection. So it's a bit puzzling when you say it keeps trying to use the wireless. How are you trying to copy files, using Finder? Try scp'ing using the ip addresses you gave, if the pings work.
BTW, I've got my laptop with a 192.x.x.x address for the wired connection, and a 10.x.x.x address for the wireless. It's having no problems seeing both networks.
bigandy
Aug 7, 06:25 PM
since they never created a 1.0 of Virtual PC (they just bought it), how do they know? :rolleyes:
kainjow
Oct 26, 11:51 AM
You have to read the AppleInsider to get the full story. Automatic brightness settings... motion detection...
"For example," Apple said, "the touch sensitive bezel can be used to sense touch gestures, such as touch and drag operations, made by the user. Using the touch gestures, a user can perform a number of user controls, such as move portions of an image that are being displayed, move a curser to drop and drag visual elements displayed scroll up and down through a screen, skip through images in an album or series of images, adjust the setting or value of a user control, or perform similar operations."
Move a cursor? mini-OS X? ;)
http://images.appleinsider.com/pantent-tsbezel-102606-6.jpg
Wow! This one looks like it could be a tablet if the hand is drawn to scale:
http://images.appleinsider.com/pantent-tsbezel-102606-7.jpg
"For example," Apple said, "the touch sensitive bezel can be used to sense touch gestures, such as touch and drag operations, made by the user. Using the touch gestures, a user can perform a number of user controls, such as move portions of an image that are being displayed, move a curser to drop and drag visual elements displayed scroll up and down through a screen, skip through images in an album or series of images, adjust the setting or value of a user control, or perform similar operations."
Move a cursor? mini-OS X? ;)
http://images.appleinsider.com/pantent-tsbezel-102606-6.jpg
Wow! This one looks like it could be a tablet if the hand is drawn to scale:
http://images.appleinsider.com/pantent-tsbezel-102606-7.jpg
savar
Oct 24, 11:06 PM
Yeah I don't think so. Unless you scale it to an exact multiple, it's going to look like crap.
With subpixel anti-aliasing (how OS X does it now), it will scale well to any size. Naturally it will get a little blurry, but it depends how you define "look like crap" as to whether it will be acceptable or not.
The real problem is that this antialiasing is an expensive operation. Maybe they can do it all on the GPU now...but they're going to have to cache those pictures somewhere. This why its a good thing that # of cores are going up and memory is getting cheaper, we will be using lots more of each when we turn on all the candy in 10.5
With subpixel anti-aliasing (how OS X does it now), it will scale well to any size. Naturally it will get a little blurry, but it depends how you define "look like crap" as to whether it will be acceptable or not.
The real problem is that this antialiasing is an expensive operation. Maybe they can do it all on the GPU now...but they're going to have to cache those pictures somewhere. This why its a good thing that # of cores are going up and memory is getting cheaper, we will be using lots more of each when we turn on all the candy in 10.5
cabes
Mar 22, 02:22 PM
What about Tandy's Deskmate? I used this in the mid-80s on the 12MHz Tandy 1000 TL/2 running MS-DOS 3.3... I think we even had a mouse with it. :)
notthebesttech
Mar 2, 01:32 AM
yes very much so, thanks appreciate it man
WhatAmI
Apr 29, 12:59 AM
toph2toast, check the official thread (http://macthemes.net/forum/viewtopic.php?id=16809773)
marksman
Apr 12, 01:04 PM
Every time I read these threads I'm reminded why I don't have an iphone. Yeah, I have many other Apple devices, including a 3G iPad, but no iphone. I refuse to be a slave to the man. I wish subsidized devices didn't exist in this country. It reduces competition by locking people into contracts and ultimately holds technology back. Yeah, more people can own the "coolest" phone, but IMHO the ends don't justify the means.
You wish everyone had to pay $700 upfront for a smartphone?
That doesn't make much sense.. Your whole position doesn't make much sense.
Making products more accessible to more people and more affordable reduces competition and holds technology back? Again your post makes no sense.
You wish everyone had to pay $700 upfront for a smartphone?
That doesn't make much sense.. Your whole position doesn't make much sense.
Making products more accessible to more people and more affordable reduces competition and holds technology back? Again your post makes no sense.
MarkCollette
Sep 14, 06:06 PM
It appears that you need to repurchase your pre iTunes 7.0 music videos if you want the improved quality. I experimented by repurchasing one of my pre iTunes 7.0 music videos. I now have two copies of the same music video. One at the old resolution; the other at the new resolution.
I believe this to be unsatisfactory. This is not a format change, but an incremental quality improvement. My computer is authorised, my account is valid, and my downloads legal.
Apple is getting two bites at the cherry!
That's why I simply did not purchase any videos at the older, lower resolution.
I believe this to be unsatisfactory. This is not a format change, but an incremental quality improvement. My computer is authorised, my account is valid, and my downloads legal.
Apple is getting two bites at the cherry!
That's why I simply did not purchase any videos at the older, lower resolution.
